<< Back
to YORKIE INFO
Pet Products May Harm Both Pets
and Humans
Products intended to kill fleas and ticks
can also poison pets and the people who handle
them.
Each year, Americans purchase and apply to their
pets a vast array of toxic chemicals intended
to kill fleas and ticks. These include collars,
sprays, dusts and more. Many consumers probably
assume that the products they use have been subjected
to rigorous testing, and must, by virtue of their
very ubiquity, be safe. After all, how could the
government let deadly poisons be sold on grocery
store shelves without applying stringent standards?
The simple truth, however, is that the poisons
in many of these products are not safe, either
for pets or humans. Government regulation of
these products has been sketchy, and testing
of their impact in the home has been inadequate.
The result is that many of the products sold
by the millions in grocery, drug and pet supply
stores, even when applied as instructed on the
box, can cause serious health consequences to
pets and humans.
The main culprits are products that rely on
a family of chemicals called organophosphates.
One of these, tetrachlorvinphos, is still found
in stores. Six others were removed from the
market, one by one, from 2000 through 2006:
chlorpyrifos, dichlorvos, phosmet, naled, diazinon
and malathion. Many pet owners may still have
leftover supplies of products containing these
chemicals in their homes. They were used in
brands marketed under a variety of names. Another
family of chemicals, called carbamates, is also
of potential concern. The two most common carbamate
chemicals used in pet products are called carbaryl
and propoxur. For a list of pet products and
the chemicals they contain, check out NRDC's
Green Paws Product Guide.
Organophosphates and carbamates work by interfering
with the transmission of nerve signals. Since
the chemical process they attack is common to
insects, humans, dogs and cats, they harm more
than just fleas and ticks. Indeed, thousands
of acute toxic poisonings have been logged at
poison control centers across the United States.
Moreover, evidence suggests the possibility
of worrisome long-term effects for children
exposed to these products at an early age, including
later-in-life cancer and perhaps Parkinson's
disease.
Children, and particularly toddlers, are especially
vulnerable for two reasons. First, their nervous
systems are still developing, so the organophosphates
can do greater and more lasting damage. Second,
children's normal behavior brings them in close
contact with their pets, and therefore to any
poisons applied to those pets. In particular,
toddlers' hand-to-mouth tendencies make it easy
for toxics to be ingested, and not just by petting
the family dog and then putting their hands
in their mouths. Because children spend their
time where the toxics from pet products tend
to accumulate -- crawling on rugs, playing with
pet toys, touching accumulations of household
dust, and more -- they are likely to come in
contact with these poisons even when they do
not touch their pet.
As bad as these products may be for pet owners
and caregivers, they often are worse for the
pets themselves. Based on the very limited data
available, it appears that hundreds and probably
thousands of pets have been injured or killed
through exposure to pet products containing
pesticides. As with small children, pets cannot
report when they're being poisoned at low doses.
Healthier alternatives to these pesticides
are readily available. Easy physical measures
like frequent bathing and combing of pets can
make the use of pesticides unnecessary. Learn
about other chemical-free flea and tick treatments
on NRDC's
Green Paws site.
The threat posed to humans and pets by the
poisons in commonly available products is intolerable
and unnecessary. With that in mind, the Natural
Resources Defense Council has filed a lawsuit
against 16 retailers and manufacturers in the
state of California for selling pet products
containing propoxur without proper warning labels.
According to the state's Safe Drinking Water
and Toxic Enforcement Act, known as Proposition
65, businesses are prohibited from exposing
consumers to any chemical "known to the
state to cause cancer or reproductive harm"
without proper warning. Through a petition,
NRDC is also calling on the EPA to immediately
ban the use of tetrachlorvinphos and propoxur
pet pesticides and to take steps to better inform
veterinarians, pet owners and the general public
about safer alternatives for the control of
fleas and ticks on pets. NRDC conducted a first-of-its-kind
study on the hazards of pesticide residue from
flea and tick collars and found that those from
tetrachlorvinphos and propoxur were high enough
to pose serious neurological and cancer risks
to children and adults who play with their pets.
Some residue levels were so high that the risk
they pose to children was up to 1,000 times
higher than the EPA's acceptable levels. These
alarming results demonstrate a significant problem
that the EPA can remedy by immediately banning
tetrachloryinphos and propoxur from pet products.
You can read all of the study's findings in
the resulting report, Poison
on Pets II: Toxic Chemical in Flea and Tick
Collars.
What Pet Owners Can Do
In the meantime, pet owners can protect their
families and their pets with some simple steps.
First, pet owners should begin using safer
products on their pets, avoiding products that
contain hazardous chemicals. Specifically, consumers
should avoid products that list tetrachlorvinphos,
carbaryl and propoxur. You can find a complete
list of harmful chemicals and their risk factors
on in the Green
Paws Product Guide.
In many cases, fleas and ticks can be controlled
with simple measures, such as brushing pets
regularly with a flea comb while inspecting
for fleas, vacuuming, and mowing frequently
in areas where pets spend the most time outdoors.
If you must resort other measures, flea control
in pill form (such as lufenuron, nitenpyram,
or spinosad) is safer than anything that leaves
a residue on the fur. If you want to choose
a topically applied product, check the labels
for the names S-methoprene or pyriproxyfen,
as these are safer alternatives. The other options
for tick treatment are less-than-ideal. There
are currently no truly safe pesticides that
are effective against ticks. Many people use
fipronil (Frontline) or selamectin (Revolution)
as first choices. Other options, such as permethrin,
pyrethrins, or imidacloprid are also effective,
although the former two chemicals should be
avoided in cats. Because these tick treatments
are all applied topically, they can leave a
residue on your pet's fur. Remember to wash
your hands (and your kids' hands) after petting
your dog or cat, and preferably avoid sleeping
with your pet when they have these treatments
on their fur.
In particular, pregnant women and families
with children should stop using organophosphate-
or carbamate-based products immediately. Finally,
children should never be allowed to apply flea
shampoos, dusts, dips, etc. to their pets. The
unfortunate truth is that the EPA has overlooked
and underestimated the particular risks to children
when evaluating the safety of these products
for home use. If you think you or your pet has
been affected by a pet product containing pesticides,
call your local poison control center if you
need immediate help, and report the incident
to the EPA's National Pesticide Telecommunications
Network, at (800) 858-7378.
NRDC - NATURAL
RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL
|